Skip to main content

Indian democracy


India is the largest democratic country in the world. Democracy is defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Democracy is considered the finest form of government in which every individual participates consciously and in which the people remain the sovereign power determining their destiny. So, in democracy the people are the ultimate source of power and its success and failure depend on their wisdom, consciousness and vigilance.
It is not possible for all the people in a big country like India to participate in the government. This is why they are required to exercise their franchise and elect their representatives at regular intervals. These representatives from the parliament legislate and form responsible government.
Such governments can be either unitary or federal. In India we have the federal form having both a government at the center responsible to the parliament and governments in the states elected and equally responsible to their legislative assemblies. But the people who participate in the election of their representatives must be educated enough to see what is good for them and who will be the right people to represent them.
India became free only in 1947 after many years of colonial rule. In the following years India had her constitution that declared India as a democratic federal republic. The first democratic election on the basis of universal adult franchise was held in 1952. However, during that election the people of India did not really had the necessary consciousness to understand democracy. They did not had the education to choose between good and evil. Many people were victims of age-old poverty, ignorance and superstitions. Many of them did not even understand the difference between the British and the new rulers. However, the entire election process were held through a democratic process.
Even to-day, after so many years, the people in India are not very much different, for many of them are illiterates. A large number of people are still below poverty level. In spite of efforts taken by the government, the Indian democracy could not the desired changes and to attain the goal of food for all, shelter for all, basic necessities for all and education for all.
There are certain conditions that are necessary for the success of Democracy in India. Those are:
Empowerment of the poor and illiterates to enjoy and protect democracy;
Willingness among the elected representatives to sincerely perform their duties and not to take advantage of the ignorance and poverty of the voters;
Willingness among intelligent, educated, and efficient people to assume the leadership role;
Willingness among the elected people not to misuse their powerful position and public wealth;
Eradication of social evils and dangers from which democracy suffers;
Fair, impartial, and efficient press to form public opinion;
Presence of strong public opinion;
Feeling of tolerance and communal harmony among the people;
Awareness among the people of the fundamental rights that they are entitled to enjoy;
Conscious check and vigilance on the working of the elected representatives;
Powerful, and responsible opposition.
It is believed by some that democracy has been of in grave peril. For, it has failed to fulfill man’s expectations.
Every form of government, whether democratic or dictatorship, has both advantages and disadvantages. Indian democracy, without doubt, is very effective and proved to be very successful. It has successfully ensured individual freedom.
It is true that, in spite of various efforts, democracy has failed to fulfill human-being’s expectations. It has failed to completely eradicate poverty, injustices, social-evils and inequalities from the Indian society.
However, we must keep in mind that there is no better form of government than a Democratic government. It is, beyond doubt, a better form of government that aristocracy, dictatorship, and monarch. There is no better alternative to democracy. To

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INDIA CHINA RELATION

A Himalayan balancing act     The great Himalayan Divide between India and China was in evidence last week following the  >  Chinese refusal to support India's case  for entry into the  > Nuclear Suppliers Group . While non-entry into the Group is not the end of the world, for India lives to fight another day, of concern is what the Chinese stance implies for the bilateral relationship between the two Asian giants. This is a relationship that has been assiduously tended over the years since the mid-seventies when ambassadorial relations between the two countries were restored at the initiative of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Despite the humiliation suffered in 1962, she famously opined that “we cannot march to Peking” and that normalisation of relations constituted the triumph of maturity over the futility of alienation. Transformation in the 1980s Cut to summertime, the year being 1986. An Indian border patrol on its way to re-establish ...
Post a Comment
Read more

land bill : Delay unlikely to impact overaoverall Indian economy

With the Congress opposing any change in retrospective clause of the Land Act brought in by the UPA in 2013, the Joint Parliamentary Committee examining the proposed amendments in the Act will now be able to submit its report only in the Winter session of Parliament. While this gives a moral victory to the Congress and other Opposition parties, economists say that the delay is unlikely to have much impact on the overall economic situation. Madan Sabnavis, chief economist, CARE Ratings, said that while the Bill per se will not have any effect on the economy, which was growing even in the absence of Land Act 2013, it “will certainly help in improving the sentiments for investments in the country”. “If the Land Bill is delayed and status quo maintained, there will be no adverse effect. However, if the Bill is passed it will certainly give an impetus to the overall economy,” he said adding that with the private sector operating at a capacity of 70-80 per cent, there is no urgency in...
1 comment
Read more

The Trump-Kim 'Historic' Encounter "

The Trump-Kim 'Historic' Encounter " The joint statement of United States(US) President Donald Trump and North Korean Chairman Kim Jong-un at their Singapore Summit on 12 June 2018 characterises the meeting as “historic,” as has the media, repeatedly. But considering that this was the first face-to-face encounter between a US president and a North Korean top leader, the laconic joint statement issued at the end of it left a lot of questions unanswered. The essence of the statement was that Trump committed to provide “security guarantees” to North Korea, and Kim “reaffirmed” his responsibility to “complete denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula.” Yes, “reaffirmed,” for Kim did the same—committed to bringing about a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons—at his summit meeting with South Korean President Moon Jae-in in April 2018. The last clause of the third article of the Panmunjom Declaration of 27 April 2018 issued by the leaders of the two Koreas, “confirmed the...
Post a Comment
Read more