Skip to main content

India joins global anti-Trump front

India joins global anti-Trump front
( Economic Times Editorial) |
 
India’s plan to raise additional import duty, worth $240 million, on a variety of imports from the US in retaliation against US tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminium imposed on national security grounds. The retaliatory tariffs on 30 products—motorcycles with engine capacity over 800cc, certain iron and steel goods, lentils, almonds, apple—show that India has joined the anti-US trade coalition that is gathering force to resist unilateralism in trade. New Delhi’s action would be noticed, principally because it comes alongside retaliatory tariffs on US imports by China, the European Union and the US’s North American Free Trade Agreement partners, Canada and Mexico. However, the amount ($240 million) that India expects to collect is tiny in relation to US exports of over $1.5 trillion.

China’s additional tariffs total $50 billion. It will levy a 25% additional tariff on 545 product categories including many farm products—soybeans, corn and wheat along with beef, pork and poultry, plus automobiles. The reprisal follows US President Donald Trump’s decision to slap a 25% tariff on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods. China has a trade surplus of about $376 billion with the US. So, the products that China had pledged to buy more of will now be slapped with higher import duties instead. It could expand the scope of punitive tariffs to coal, crude oil, gasoline and medical equipment. Punitive levies on US soyabean and pork will hurt states that had backed Trump in 2016.
The EU has proposed additional tariffs on US imports worth a modest $4.5 billion. It targets products—such as bourbon and orange juice—from politically sensitive Republican-run states. Mexico too had pork in its cross-chairs. The US has stalled appointment of judges to the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism and has adopted protection on grounds of national security. The rest of the world has to come together to defend the rules-based world trading system, and that means standing up to US bullying tactics and explicitly channeling disputes through the World Trade Organization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INDIA CHINA RELATION

A Himalayan balancing act     The great Himalayan Divide between India and China was in evidence last week following the  >  Chinese refusal to support India's case  for entry into the  > Nuclear Suppliers Group . While non-entry into the Group is not the end of the world, for India lives to fight another day, of concern is what the Chinese stance implies for the bilateral relationship between the two Asian giants. This is a relationship that has been assiduously tended over the years since the mid-seventies when ambassadorial relations between the two countries were restored at the initiative of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Despite the humiliation suffered in 1962, she famously opined that “we cannot march to Peking” and that normalisation of relations constituted the triumph of maturity over the futility of alienation. Transformation in the 1980s Cut to summertime, the year being 1986. An Indian border patrol on its way to re-establish ...

land bill : Delay unlikely to impact overaoverall Indian economy

With the Congress opposing any change in retrospective clause of the Land Act brought in by the UPA in 2013, the Joint Parliamentary Committee examining the proposed amendments in the Act will now be able to submit its report only in the Winter session of Parliament. While this gives a moral victory to the Congress and other Opposition parties, economists say that the delay is unlikely to have much impact on the overall economic situation. Madan Sabnavis, chief economist, CARE Ratings, said that while the Bill per se will not have any effect on the economy, which was growing even in the absence of Land Act 2013, it “will certainly help in improving the sentiments for investments in the country”. “If the Land Bill is delayed and status quo maintained, there will be no adverse effect. However, if the Bill is passed it will certainly give an impetus to the overall economy,” he said adding that with the private sector operating at a capacity of 70-80 per cent, there is no urgency in...

Albert Einstein: free thinking and hidebound attitudes

The Guardian view on Albert Einstein: free thinking and hidebound attitudes Editorial Albert Einstein’s humanitarian reputation almost matches his scientific stature. From the 1930s onwards he vigorously denounced racism, “a disease of white people”, once observing that “being a Jew myself, perhaps I can understand and empathise with how black people feel as victims of discrimination”. So it is especially shocking to learn of racist and misogynist comments that he made while travelling in Asia in the 1920s. In his newly published diaries from the period, he describes the Chinese as “industrious, filthy, obtuse” and “a peculiar herd-like nation”. Though he praises their modesty and gentleness, he also echoes contemporary warnings that they posed a demographic threat: “It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.” How could a figure renowned for his empathy and wisdom have written such passages? The answer ...